Re: need kernel update for lenny ..
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: need kernel update for lenny ..
- From: Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 20:58:17 +1200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20120903085816.GF25171@tal>
- In-reply-to: <k1lj95$koe$14@ger.gmane.org>
- References: <CAFNHiA9BJC8wzi1eCCZsVHJSS8KWKAYN3uzi=6CUnvHe0eiA8A@mail.gmail.com> <k1lf4s$koe$11@ger.gmane.org> <503E418A.9000209@marupa.net> <k1lfuh$koe$12@ger.gmane.org> <503E4CAA.5070805@vanderhoff.org> <k1lj95$koe$14@ger.gmane.org>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 05:24:53PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:08:58 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
>
> > On 29/08/12 17:28, Camaleón wrote:
> >> It does not matter that Lenny is out of support (formerly codenamed
> >> "oldstable") because even the current stable release (Squeeze) neither
> >> get kernel upgrades (for kernel upgrades I mean going from 2.6.26 to
> >> 2.6.32 or 3.x branch, for instance). Kernel upgrades in Debian only
> >> happen in testing (until becomes frozen) and sid.
> >>
> > Unless there's an upgrade to fix a security issue, I believe?
>
> Sure, that's what I said in an earlier post¹ ;-)
LOL, come on ... nice try though. Hey! we all make misteaks
> But still security updates for the kernel keep the same branch
> (2.6.32), they can't jump so far because of compatibility (ABI) issues.
Huh? For a start, the fix is backported so that only the problematic
code is corrected. Not all kernels are vulnerable to the same security
fault, hence a vulnerability in a 3.x kernel doesn't mean that it
affects kernels in the 2.6.26 - 2.6.32 range.
> ¹http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/08/msg01890.html
No mention about security support in that post either ..., or was it in
another thread?
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: