[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian sid bug?



On 27 August 2012 23:44, Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> At Joe and Bob. Do you use multi arch? It seems to be a problem for
>> multi arch.
>
> I do because multiarch is now a capability of dpkg and I use dpkg.
> But I haven't used it explicitly.  I am running a pure 64-bit amd64
> installation without any explicit ia32 packages installated.
>
> I ran reportbug on libqt4-sql-sqlite and it produced this package tree
> on my system:
>
>   Versions of packages libqt4-sql-sqlite depends on:
>   ii  libc6              2.13-35
>   ii  libgcc1            1:4.7.1-7
>   ii  libqt4-sql         4:4.8.2+dfsg-1
>   ii  libqtcore4         4:4.8.2+dfsg-1
>   ii  libsqlite3-0       3.7.13-1
>   ii  libstdc++6         4.7.1-7
>   ii  multiarch-support  2.13-35
>
> Notice that the versions above are "+dfsg-1" versions and not "+b1"
> versions.  The original poster was having problems with "+b1" versions
> which have been replaced with the newer "+dfsg-1" versions.
>
> If you are having problems with multiarch it would be informative to
> me if you would explain the problem.  I don't see any 32-bit libs in
> any of the above and so don't see how it would affect things.  I think
> it more likely that an out of date mirror or an out of date package
> list is the problem.
>
> However "+b1" is a binary NMU version and so perhaps someone did a
> binary NMU but inconsistently across the architectures?  That is
> certainly possible.  And would explain why it is working on amd64 just
> fine but broken on another one.
>
> The PTS shows this package very recently uploaded and built.  It may
> not have propagated everywhere yet.  The build failed on ia64.
>
>   http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qt4-x11.html

I've found the solution here:

http://aptosid.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&p=15393


Reply to: