On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:26:25PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > There is a problem with the mashing and reformatting. It makes lzip > appear to be 66M against xz being 65M and so xz is better, right? snip > It would be better to look at the long byte counts for this type of > comparison. You're right, that would be necessary to be accurate. An exercise left for another reader!