Re: which one is faster?
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Jochen Spieker <ml@well-adjusted.de> wrote:
> lina:
>>
>> It's a bit big data to transfer, around 1.1 T,
>>
>> from one server to another server.
>
> Either use rsync without encryption (= not tunneled over SSH), or pipe
> tar through netcat. The latter does not support resuming.
Thanks. I failed to find the mute the encryption options in rsync.
BTW, How to set the port for netcat?
The remote one has the following ports open:
Not shown: 987 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
21/tcp open ftp
22/tcp open ssh
80/tcp open http
111/tcp open rpcbind
711/tcp open cisco-tdp
1027/tcp open IIS
1029/tcp open ms-lsa
3001/tcp open nessus
3389/tcp open ms-wbt-server
8649/tcp open unknown
8651/tcp open unknown
8652/tcp open unknown
15004/tcp open unknown
$ nc badapple.net 21
220 (vsFTPd 2.0.5)
it chocked there.
another one has:
Not shown: 995 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
80/tcp open http
443/tcp open https
3128/tcp open squid-http
8080/tcp open http-proxy
8888/tcp open sun-answerbook
>
> If you can tell us a bit more, we might be able to help better. Do you
> have many small files or just a fewer big files? How fast and reliable
> is the connection between the two computers?
It's 8000 files, half 400M, half 5M.
I don't know the reliable of the connection between the two servers, I
guess it's okay.
But from my side, the wireless is not stable.
I don't know how to let it stable. I mean, not login every 10~15 minutes.
(btw, Is big wind affects the wireless signal, kinda of silly to ask,
I prefer the fresh air outside, so move laptop outside)
>
> J.
> --
> When driving at night I find the headlights of oncoming vehicles very
> attractive.
> [Agree] [Disagree]
> <http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
Reply to: