On Vi, 03 aug 12, 16:28:30, Joel Rees wrote: > > systemd is far too disruptive to have been stuffed into the main > branch of Fedora the way it was. Good engineering would have been to > have set up two concurrent forks of Fedora, to keep reference points > available when working on the integration, and to provide a safety net > when systemd's basic design errors surface. You are of course aware that the purpose of Fedora is to experiment with new technologies. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_(operating_system) ,---- | One of Fedora's main objectives is not only to contain software | distributed under a free and open source license, but also to be on the | leading edge of such technologies. `---- Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature