Re: buffer bloat or Squid issue ?
FYI : IPCOP currently sets to masqurading. i am not using the squid
facility right now.
Thanks
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan <sirtcp@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Tom Grace
> <lists-in@deathbycomputers.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 29/06/12 14:15, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>>> i have done some test and here are some details and results
>>>
>>> i am using two machine
>>>
>>> 1, Gateway IPcop (linux)
>>> 2. Debian lenny (squid)
>>>
>>> i am using download manager to download a 50MB file.
>>>
>>> IPCOP
>>> -----------
>>> when i do it VIA IPCOP my download burst rate up to 270 KB
>>> not ping delay and other can also brows easily.
>>>
>>> Squid on Lenny
>>> ------------------------
>>>
>>> VIA SQuid (proxy mode) my download reach 365 which is full throughput
>>> and faster then IPCOP but
>>> ping delay reach 4000 which is considered almost near to death.
>>>
>>> and no other users can browse and getting time out message on there browser.
>>>
>>>
>>> i think this shows that issue is with squid box and i don't know
>>> weather i have to tweak the squid or TCP buffer or anything
>> You may want to throttle the connection in Squid. It seems like the
>> connection is saturated, though under normal circumstances it that
>> wouldn't cause the level of trouble that you are seeing. It might be
>> worth investigating the settings on the IPCOP box.
>> Your theory about buffers could well be correct, but probably the
>> simplest thing to do is limit the maximum speed to around 95% of the
>> available bandwidth (may require some experimentation).
>
> for that i have to read 3 delaypools :(, means lots of testing..............
>
> is there anyway or utility which can help me in this regard on OS level.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>> Archive: [🔎] 4FEDC297.7080302@deathbycomputers.co.uk">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 4FEDC297.7080302@deathbycomputers.co.uk
>>
Reply to: