Re: buffer bloat or Squid issue ?
i have done some test and here are some details and results
i am using two machine
1, Gateway IPcop (linux)
2. Debian lenny (squid)
i am using download manager to download a 50MB file.
IPCOP
-----------
when i do it VIA IPCOP my download burst rate up to 270 KB
not ping delay and other can also brows easily.
Squid on Lenny
------------------------
VIA SQuid (proxy mode) my download reach 365 which is full throughput
and faster then IPCOP but
ping delay reach 4000 which is considered almost near to death.
and no other users can browse and getting time out message on there browser.
i think this shows that issue is with squid box and i don't know
weather i have to tweak the squid or TCP buffer or anything
i am lost please help.
Thanks,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan <sirtcp@gmail.com> wrote:
> see the ping delay of my proxy server.
> see first few lines which is before download when i start download a
> huge file it when to 3000 which is too much and this is the only
> reason i think why it is happening. now at the bottem of this ping
> responce you will see when i cancled the download job things back to
> normal.
>
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7361
> ttl=54 time=70.3 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7368
> ttl=54 time=68.0 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7369
> ttl=54 time=70.6 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7370
> ttl=54 time=196 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7371
> ttl=54 time=787 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7372
> ttl=54 time=1141 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7373
> ttl=54 time=1689 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7374
> ttl=54 time=2113 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7375
> ttl=54 time=2262 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7376
> ttl=54 time=2806 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7377
> ttl=54 time=3083 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7378
> ttl=54 time=3181 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7386
> ttl=54 time=1846 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7387
> ttl=54 time=1923 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7388
> ttl=54 time=1807 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7389
> ttl=54 time=831 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7390
> ttl=54 time=71.2 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7391
> ttl=54 time=69.2 ms
> 64 bytes from del01s05-in-f7.1e100.net (74.125.236.7): icmp_req=7392
> ttl=54 time=69.3 ms
Reply to: