[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: AppArmor or SELinux?



On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 15:41 -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Ralf Mardorf
>> <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 18:45 +0200, Claudius Hubig wrote:
>>>>
>>>> AppArmor doesn’t add a single thread to a running Linux system.
>>>
>>> So it's a voodoo-ghost and doesn't need resources?
>>
>> If you think that it's using a thread, please show it!
>>
>> (I don't care either way...)
>
> Ok, but it's included and has some impact. To be fair, I don't notice
> any performance differences with and without it.

You'd probably have to compile a kernel without apparmor support to
see a difference. Whether the difference'd be human-detectable's
probably up for debate.


Reply to: