[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to use spamfilters at home



On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:19:44PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> 
> You're right. Anyway, my question is about a shared database for spam,
> between spamfilters for home computer MUA and servers such as mailing
> list servers. I suspect that (for good reasons) there usually isn't such
> a shared database.

And if there was, mails like sams would be designed to bugger them up?
mmm, so there probably is a shared database, or "set of rules" to grade
each mail.

As to a possible home/SOHO solution, have a look at bogofilter:

tal% apt-cache show bogofilter
Package: bogofilter
Source: bogofilter (1.2.2+dfsg1-1)
Version: 1.2.2+dfsg1-1+b1
Installed-Size: 21
Maintainer: Serafeim Zanikolas <sez@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Depends: bogofilter-common, bogofilter-bdb | bogofilter-db
Description-en: fast Bayesian spam filter (dummy package)
 This package implements a fast Bayesian spam filter along the lines
 suggested by Paul Graham in his article "A Plan For Spam".
   .
 This version substantially improves on Paul's proposal by doing
 smarter lexical analysis.  In particular, hostnames and IP addresses are
 retained as recognition features rather than broken up. Various kinds of
 MTA cruft such as dates and message-IDs are discarded so as not to
 bloat the word lists.
Description-md5: 968ec277af1658df73a6620e1ea6c7f7
Tag: implemented-in::c, interface::commandline, mail::filters, role::dummy,
 role::metapackage, role::program, use::filtering,
 use::scanning, works-with::mail
Section: mail
Priority: optional
Filename:
pool/main/b/bogofilter/bogofilter_1.2.2+dfsg1-1+b1_i386.deb
Size: 982
MD5sum: d1b25bf1a2b93b933ad6f3c5dfcfdcba
SHA1: 8ad5c3a9079461506bbdc65ea38a5f5c66b7fc79
SHA256: c8c09bf7cf61cb88b0c6002cd6c6ebef536e18c96c36da411b0707527b129a69

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


Reply to: