Re: `free' in GNU and DSFG?
On Thu, 31 May 2012 16:48:30 +0100, rjc wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:00:39PM BST, Camaleón wrote:
>> If by "reverse" you mean a case sample of we being less restrictive,
>> well, the fact of having "contrib" and "non-oss" repositories available
> ^^^^^^^
> Obviously that should be "non-free".
Oops, sorry. That was openSUSE parlance.
(it's incredible; despite I migrated from openSUSE to Debian ~3 years ago
I still have it surrounding my mind :-o)
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: