Re: Spam filter -please !
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:03:40PM +0200, Tom Rausner wrote:
> I know they catch about 40,000 spams a day, but that's not the issue. I
> was just surprised to see this HTML-monster getting through.
AIUI, the filtering is set up to "err on the side of caution", IOW, it is
more important to let a possible spam through than block a possible ham.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to: