Re: OT: More about GPG signing
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 03:18:02PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > Whilst the above is true, it's also true that inline signing isn't
> > going away soon because of certain companies reticence about
> > implementing it correctly or at all.
>
> Where "it" refers to the PGP/MIME standard, of course.
Even if Enigmail made PGP/MIME the default, or even better remove inline
signing completely?
--
"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet."
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
Reply to: