[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: More about GPG signing

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 03:18:02PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > Whilst the above is true, it's also true that inline signing isn't
> > going away soon because of certain companies reticence about
> > implementing it correctly or at all.
> Where "it" refers to the PGP/MIME standard, of course.

Even if Enigmail made PGP/MIME the default, or even better remove inline
signing completely?

"Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet."
   -- Napoleon Bonaparte

Reply to: