Re: OT: More about GPG signing
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:47:04PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012 09:16:33 -0400
> "Jeremy T. Bouse" <jeremy.bouse@undergrid.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Jeremy,
>
> > those that wish to do so. Inline simply generates too much needless
> > noise and is a method that's at least 10 years out dated since the
> > PGP/MIME standard was adopted.
>
> Whilst the above is true, it's also true that inline signing isn't going
> away soon because of certain companies reticence about implementing it
> correctly or at all.
>
I think the point is that if a person knows how to sign then they know
how to sign only what is necessary.
This list does not required signed email, nor does it only recognize
inline. So really, it's pretty simple issue. Can't imagine why so many
people fail to grasp it, unless they just don't want to.
As Scott said, it becomes a digital fetish for some people.
--
❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
Indulekha
Reply to: