[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Icedove setting



On 04/17/2012 08:05 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:20:32 +0800, lina wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> (...)
>
>>>> I noticed the google use 465 as SMTP port.
>>> Every e-mail provider can use a different combo for authentication/
>>> configuration/port but you have to stick to what Outlook Live service
>>> needs. I mean, what Gmail needs it cannot work for Yahoo! or Hotmail
>>> or...
>> Hi,
>>
>> (Nice seeing your reply, shake hands, virtual though.)
> :-)
>  
>> Have you noticed that in icedove --> Edit --> Account Settings
>>
>> At the bottom of the left column, there is one item calls: Outgoing
>> Server (SMTP),
>> click it, there is an option to choose the default outgoing server
>> settings. I chose google one as default.
> Yes, I know you can have multiple outgoing servers configured (in fact, I 
> do have a bunch) but there are some e-mail providers that will reject 
> sending e-mails which don't come from their own address (@example.com) 
> and you still don't have your Outlook Live setup correctly ;-)
>
>>> Set Up Mozilla Thunderbird 3.0 for Your E-Mail Account
>>> http://help.outlook.com/en-us/140/ee958689.aspx
>> Yes, I followed exactly with minor tweak in port.
> No "minor tweaks" my lady ;-), you have to configure the smtp server as 
> they say, which means you have to search for the proper "smtp settings" 
> as the video at the bottom explains ("How do I find the server 
> settings?").
+1, first follow the instructions precisely, then do any tweaking.
> If you are convinced you're using the right data for the smtp server and 
> still getting an error, try to setup the same account from another e-mail 
> client (better from an outlookized machine to discard a windowsity 
> anomaly) and see how it goes. Should this neither works, I would contact 
> the Outlook Live assistance/technical support service and explain your 
> problem.
>
> Greetings,
>


Reply to: