On Du, 01 apr 12, 20:45:02, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> So, I persist to say that the 2 sentences are contradictory. I'll
> propose a slight modification to remove this contradiction:
>
> 1/ in 4.4.6, replace
>
> The upgrade process for other releases recommended the use of
> aptitude for the upgrade. This tool is not recommended for upgrades
> from lenny to squeeze.
>
> by
>
> The recommended tool for system upgrade from Lenny to Squeeze
> is apt-get. For upgrades to previous releases, it is aptitude
I don't think this is necessary, the upgrade from a prior release to the
next is to be done by following the corresponding release notes anyway.
> 2/ in the Debian faq, replace
>
> Note that apt-get now installs recommended packages as default and is
> the preferred program for package management from console to perform
> system installation and major system upgrades for its robustness.
>
> by
>
> Note that apt-get now installs recommended packages as default and is,
> for its robustness, the preferred program for package management from
> console to perform system installation and major system upgrades to
> releases posterior to Lenny.
I'd suggest this instead:
Note that apt-get now installs recommended packages by default and
is, for its robustness, the preferred program for package management
from console, to perform system installation, and major system
upgrades to releases as of Squeeze.
What do you think?
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature