Re: Xen vs KVM

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Xen vs KVM
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:51:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201203301651.40874.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CA+AKB6GO1zCy=ojApmTSeLiSbHtezA7BQrS6kTnycDxXXaUNjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 4F714A79.4000808@gmail.com> <[🔎] CAE1pOi1uMXnT_sdFbndOiM10KdGiVxNWvya9HOhKHJBj7HDVgw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CA+AKB6GO1zCy=ojApmTSeLiSbHtezA7BQrS6kTnycDxXXaUNjg@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20120330_003204_250170_EC600344)

Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2012 schrieb francis picabia:
> Xen requires a patched kernel.  It is unstable.  It crashed on
> me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff.
> The system which experienced this returned to a standard
> Debian kernel and never had a problem again.

Not any longer as far as I know. AFAIR at least with 3.2 there is 
everything necessary upstream.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

Reply to:

References:
- When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?
  - From: "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" <ubuntu.fan.2012@gmail.com>
- Re: Xen vs KVM
  - From: Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com>
- Re: Xen vs KVM
  - From: francis picabia <fpicabia@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Some KDE apps depend on kdebase-runtime, which is transitional
Next by Date: Re: printer Kyocera FSC-5100DN
Previous by thread: Re: Xen vs KVM
Next by thread: Re: Xen vs KVM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread