[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can no longer mount SDHC card



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:29:28 +0700, Ken Heard wrote:
> 
>> I have a Lenovo R61 laptop which has a built-in SD card slot.  The
>> operating system is Lenny.
>>
>> Ever since I bought this laptop in May 2008 I have been able to mount in
>> it SDHC cards from my Canon 60D digital camera.  The relevant line in
>> fstab is and has always been:
>>
>> /dev/mmcblk0p1  /media/sd     vfat    user,noauto,noatime     0       0
> 
> If you're using a DE, I would let it to mount external devices 
> automatically, that is, by commenting (#) the above line in /etc/fstab. 
> Then, as soon as you attache the card it should be recognized, detected 
> and mounted under /media.

I did as you suggested -- commented out that line in fstab -- and
inserted the card.  It was not recognized, detected or mounted under
media.  The DE I am using is KDE 3.5.10.

>> Within the last three hours however -- through no conscious intervention
>> on my part -- I have been unable to mount an SDHC card installed in this
>> slot.  The command "mount sd" returns the following:
>>
>> mount: special device /dev/mmcblk0p1 does not exist
> 
> And it may be true. Run "/sbin/blkid".

It is true; I had already discovered that that device does not now
exist, although it must have existed more than three hours ago.

>> I will consequently be grateful for advice to help me find out what is
>> wrong and how to fix it.
> 
> Open a terminal, run "dmesg | tail" and then insert the card to see 
> what's going on.

I ran that "dmesg|tail" both before and after installing the SDHC card
On all occasions that command reported nothing.

Ken

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAk9otEQACgkQlNlJzOkJmTcHoQCaA9WPglAB7Y8od5nCV/jCUh2G
wAMAn2QsIi6oRv7LaBxLMRDTwIbNzdCJ
=mMeF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: