Re: icedove / Squeeze / 3.0.11-1+squeeze7
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:26:58 +0000, Frederic Robert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:55:05PM +0000, Camaleón wrote:
>> There's a workaround at comment #294 (I would try with that first) but
>> the problem seems to be solved for package "eglibc 2.13-17".
>
>
> It's working. When will be this package eglibc 2.13-17 backported for
> people are using Squeeze.
As per that bug report, there are many packages involved:
***
Binary: libc-bin libc-dev-bin glibc-doc eglibc-source locales locales-all
nscd multiarch-support libc6 libc6-dev libc6-dbg libc6-prof libc6-pic
libc6-udeb libc6.1 libc6.1-dev libc6.1-dbg libc6.1-prof libc6.1-pic
libc6.1-udeb libc0.3 libc0.3-dev libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-prof libc0.3-pic
libc0.3-udeb libc0.1 libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-prof libc0.1-pic
libc0.1-udeb libc6-i386 libc6-dev-i386 libc6-sparc64 libc6-dev-sparc64
libc6-s390 libc6-dev-s390 libc6-s390x libc6-dev-s390x libc6-amd64 libc6-
dev-amd64 libc6-powerpc libc6-dev-powerpc libc6-ppc64 libc6-dev-ppc64
libc6-mipsn32 libc6-dev-mipsn32 libc6-mips64 libc6-dev-mips64 libc0.1-
i386 libc0.1-dev-i386 libc6-i686 libc6-xen libc0.1-i686 libc0.3-i686
libc0.3-xen libc6.1-alphaev67 libc6-loongson2f libnss-dns-udeb libnss-
files-udeb
***
I don't know if that situation makes it advisable for upgrading in
stable :-?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: