Re: Sun fire installation error - using debian-6.0.3-sparc-DVD-1.iso
Hi.
On Wednesday 28 December 2011 06:31:36 nrdoss@xerago.com wrote:
> Hi support,
>
> I am using debian-6.0.3-sparc-DVD-1.iso and i am try to install in Sunfire
> T1000 server using boot net command in ok prompt,but I am getting TFTP
> Error: Access Violation,
> Please find below the server configuration and all.
Do I understand you right? You want to boot from your Debian DVD?
In this case, at the OK prompt you have to say
boot cdrom
( or boot cdrom1 or cdrom2, depending on your hardeware - I don't know the Sun
Fire).
boot net
means that you try to load the boot code via your ethernet interface. In this
case you have to set up a boot server (dhcp and tftp server). Not a big deal,
but you need an additional (Linux) computer.
Regards,
Hartwig
> Error:
>
> ok boot net DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text video=atyfb:offa cdrom-detect/eject=false
> netcfg/disable_dhcp=true modules=network-console
>
> Boot device: /pci@7c0/pci@0/network@4 File and args: DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text
> video=atyfb:offa cdrom-detect/eject=false netcfg/disable_dhcp=true
> modules=network-console
>
> 100 Mbps FDX Link up
>
> TFTP Error: Access violation
>
>
>
> Boot load failed
>
>
> Before i am setting the boot-arguments to the following command.
>
> ok setenv network-boot-arguments
> host-ip=10.0.30.134,router-ip=10.0.90.16,subnet-mask=255.0.0.0,hostname=sun
>.testdebian.com,file=tftp://10.0.30.133/export/home/tftpboot/debian-6.0.3-sp
>ark-DVD-1.iso
>
>
> Server Config:
>
> Sun Fire(TM) T1000, No Keyboard
>
> Copyright 2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
>
> OpenBoot 4.20.0, 16376 MB memory available, Serial #67282954.
>
> Ethernet address 0:14:4f:2:a8:a, Host ID: 8402a80a.
>
> sc> showhost
>
> Host flash versions:
>
> Reset V1.0.0
>
> Hypervisor 1.1.0 2005/12/15 11:10
>
> OBP 4.20.0 2005/12/15 16:49
>
> MPT SAS FCode Version 1.00.37 (2005.06.13)
>
> Sun Fire[TM] T1000 POST 4.20.0 2005/12/15 17:21
>
> Kindly assist the and give some clarity steps for the sucessful
> installation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regards,
> Ramdoss.
Reply to: