[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Why not gnome3 (with gnome-shell)?

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Javier Barroso <javibarroso@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom <hvw59601@care2.com> wrote:
>> Walter Hurry wrote:
>>> On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:27:01 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>>> GNOME Shell is the defining technology of the GNOME 3 user experience.
>>> That's exactly the problem, and precisely why I have moved on to LXDE.
>> Well, for years I have been using FVWM. It does everything one could
>> possibly want, except not quite what Compiz does for eyecandy. That was the
>> reason I moved to Gnome. Will try LXDE and XFCE4, I guess.
> Hi,
> Currently I'm using (as second main desktop, first is awesome ;) )
> gnome3. I can read a lot of criticism about it
> What don't you like ing GNOME 3 - GNOME - Shell?
> I only see two things, but people sure see many more (many people tell
> about don't like the change):
> - It seems like it is not very configurable via GUI without installing
> any other tool which help with
> - Shutdown option is not appearing in menu (only when you type ALT
> (gnome developers should think we are not seers (where more in gnome
> ALT (without any combo) is used?) you can see that hide option, if not
> you will see only suspend option)
> So, why people is hungry with it ?
> Thanks for your opinion!
> PD: I think it run fine in relatively old computers (but maybe that is
> another issue, I don't know)
PD2: Ok, I see you need 3d accel [1], not sense to me.

[1] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/FAQ#What_led_to_the_decision_to_make_3D_acceleration_a_requirement_for_GNOME_Shell.3F

Reply to: