Re: which command I should use to output sequentially,

[lina <lina.lastname@gmail.com>]

Thanks for all.

May I ask further, which is the best (systematic) way of learning the
script, based on all your experience.

Welcome any advice,

Thanks with regards,

lina

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:54 PM, shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2011 4:28 AM, "Ivan Shmakov" <ivan@gray.siamics.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> shawn wilson <ag4ve.us@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>  > However, I'd look at some of the bio perl modules if this was the
>>  > type of data I was looking at.  Either way, learning dozens of tools
>>  > to manipulate lots of data is quite time consuming, prone to failure,
>>  > and quite frankly senseless.
>>
>>        How it's different to learning dozens of functions documented in
>>        perlfunc(3)?  Or even more, should CPAN modules be taken into
>>        account?  How could it be that the Shell commands do not form a
>>        library, or a set of, of a sort?
>>
>
> Different commands use different switches and do the same thing (sed vs awk
> vs grep for tons of uses), bash is slower. And I find it easier for bad /
> different data to break a shell script (well I can technically stop most
> languages from earring with try / catch which is a plus but not the point)
> and verifying data in bash is a pita. Also, idk of any debug option in bash
> (perl -d, gdb, etc).
>
> However, this is not answering the op's question. So, while I started this,
> I'll start a new thread if we wish to continue this (preferably with code
> examples :) ). And I do hope you wish to continue this as I find the debate
> fun but way OT (per op question) at this point.