Re: Multiple Network Gateways

[Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttmail.com>]

On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:58:10 +0200, lee writes:
> Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttmail.com> writes:
>
>>    ,===========.               eth0   ,-------.
>>   || internet  || <-----------------> | reyiz |
>>    `==========='        10.10.98.100  `-------'
>>                                          ^
>>                                     eth1 | 192.168.100.100
>>                                          |
>>                                          |
>>                                          |
>>   ,-------.   eth3                       |
>>   | pampa | <----------------------------+
>>   `-------^   192.168.100.98
>>
>> [...]
>
> So there are a lot of hosts not shown on the scheme?

Yep, and pampa will be the gateway to 192.168.100.0 network for reyiz.

>> reyiz# route -n
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
>> 10.10.98.96     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth0
>> 192.168.100.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
>> 0.0.0.0         192.168.100.98  0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1
>> 0.0.0.0         10.10.98.110    0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
>>
>> The problem here is that there exists two entries in the routing table
>> for 0.0.0.0 network pointing to both eth0 and eth1. But I just want to
>> have 192.168.100.0 network requests to be handled by eth1, the rest
>> should be redirected to eth0.
>
> There are no 0.0.0.0 networks, only 192.168.100.0 and 10.10.98.96.  Try
> 'route' instead of 'route -n' ...

I intentionally used -n, I know there are no 0.0.0.0 networks. But it
still doesn't answer to my question that how can I make just
192.168.100.0 requests get routed through 192.168.100.98 gw machine.


Best.