[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Multiple Network Gateways



Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttmail.com> writes:

>    ,===========.               eth0   ,-------.
>   || internet  || <-----------------> | reyiz |
>    `==========='        10.10.98.100  `-------'
>                                          ^
>                                     eth1 | 192.168.100.100
>                                          |
>                                          |
>                                          |
>   ,-------.   eth3                       |
>   | pampa | <----------------------------+
>   `-------^   192.168.100.98
>
> [...]

So there are a lot of hosts not shown on the scheme?

> reyiz# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> 10.10.98.96     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.240 U     0      0        0 eth0
> 192.168.100.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
> 0.0.0.0         192.168.100.98  0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1
> 0.0.0.0         10.10.98.110    0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
>
> The problem here is that there exists two entries in the routing table
> for 0.0.0.0 network pointing to both eth0 and eth1. But I just want to
> have 192.168.100.0 network requests to be handled by eth1, the rest
> should be redirected to eth0.

There are no 0.0.0.0 networks, only 192.168.100.0 and 10.10.98.96.  Try
'route' instead of 'route -n' ...


-- 
html messages are obsolete


Reply to: