Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
From: Marc Shapiro <marcnshap@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 20:25:37 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 4D8FFFB1.6070808@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4D8FF7ED.90909@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 4D8FE5C9.90507@gmail.com> <[🔎] 4D8FEE96.6070603@cox.net> <[🔎] 20110328022602.GB3843@n0nb.us> <[🔎] 4D8FF7ED.90909@gmail.com>

On 03/27/11 19:52, Scott Ferguson wrote:


And Double-U Double-U - I "know" that is how it's supposed to be, but
I've spent years (delighting in) saying "wuh" "wuh" "wuh" (as in the
Magyar "w").


How about combining all three of them into 'hexa-u"?

Marc

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
  - From: Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net>

References:
- dpkg: syntax error
  - From: Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.productions@gmail.com>
- You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
  - From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
  - From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
- Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
  - From: Scott Ferguson <prettyfly.productions@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
Next by Date: lcds display from Shenzhen Aroseks Technology CO.,LTD~Echo Deng
Previous by thread: Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
Next by thread: Re: You touched one of my pet peeves (was Re: dpkg: syntax error)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread