Re: SPAM SPAM SPAM !!! Re: Sip?
on 22:36 Tue 15 Mar, Heddle Weaver (weaver2world@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 18:52, Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Lu, 14 mar 11, 21:11:47, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
> > > or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and I suggest you don't
> > > either.
> >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
> > > > by the wise as false,
> > > > and by the rulers as useful.
> > > >
> > > > — Lucius Annæus Seneca.
> > > >
> > > > Terrorism, the new religion.
> >
> > Not quite the typical .sig of a spammer (besides recognizing it from
> > other posts) ;)
> >
>
> Thanks for the vote of confidence, Andrei
> Regards,
A smidge of context would have been helpful. Well, a smidge /more/ than
'SIP'.
I'd seen reference to the GNU Free Call project elsewhere. But
otherwise this was just a tad on the terse side.
Even Twitter allows you 140 bytes.
--
Dr. Ed Morbius, Chief Scientist / |
Robot Wrangler / Staff Psychologist | When you seek unlimited power
Krell Power Systems Unlimited | Go to Krell!
Reply to: