Re: A Debian -offtopic mailing list: to be or not to be
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: A Debian -offtopic mailing list: to be or not to be
- From: Heddle Weaver <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 05:23:15 +1000
- Message-id: <AANLkTimMg-Mo3XZeGEp_1wNOmn_k=0nEh7Qfp7_wDpAh@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20110228153404.GN6584@think.homelan>
- References: <20110228153404.GN6584@think.homelan>
On 1 March 2011 01:34, Andrei Popescu <email@example.com>
[Cross-posted to: d-community-offtopic, debian-user]
[For those who don't know what I'm talking about, please see #425439
Being the stubborn person that I am, I want to give one more chance to
the -offtopic list for Debian users and/or developers.
Off topic subjects still seem to thrive on debian-user anyway.
And a separate list may have seemed necessary in the days when d-u was *really* busy, but that doesn't seem to be the case at the moment.
I see other lists that aren't employed to their potential also, e.g., posts with reference to firewalls that should (for reference sake) be posted on debian-firewall. If that policy was more strictly adhered to, it would lower the stress on d-u in times of high usage.
I know it's a hassle to subscribe to another list just to post on a particular subject, but it would be at least as big a problem referencing half a dozen lists for the answer to a question, when the archive is kept for that reason in the first place.
I feel that policy should be established and enforced by the users to achieve an orderly, efficient archive.
Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
by the wise as false,
and by the rulers as useful.
— Lucius Annæus Seneca.
Terrorism, the new religion.