Re: Fontconfig error
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:32:16 +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On 2011-02-26, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Now we have just one root element, but that's only a partial solution.
>>> The file local.conf should itself be a valid and well-formed XML
>>> document.
>>
>> Yes, and that's why I suggested the user to open a bug report, there
>> are still many unanswered questions on why this error is presented to
>> the user.
>
> Respectfully, I disagree. If one of the XML documents is invalid then
> the parser emits an error message. I see no bug here.
The error is clear: either the file should be corrected (unless the user
had manually removed or tweaked the original file) or the output error
should be properly handled.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
Reply to: