Re: Flash is open?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:45:36 +0200, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> Oh, no, but... If W3C does not trust "Flash" technology to be included
>>> as one of their recommended standards, why should I? That is the point.
>>
>> Linux, FreeBSD, OSX and other OSs included in that W3C standards? I
>> think the answer is no... Do you have trust in them?
>
> "Linux, FreeBSD, OSX and other OSs" all of them include their own
> licencing model, whatever it is (closed or open sourced), so I can use
> the software knowing beforehand what I can (or can't) do with it.
You've talked about W3C recommended standards and not about licenses.
> Do not get me wrong, I'm only saying that if I were a developer, I would
> have many doubts in choosing a flash format for any of my works.
Developers never forced to use Flash/SWF or any other standards. If
you have any doubts in SWF just use other format.
Bye,
a
Reply to: