Re: Hptalx is buggy once calculator is plugged and linked
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, 07 May 2010 19:36:36 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
>>> Just a wild guess, but try to launch the application as "root" user.
>>> Maybe it's a device permissions issue :-?
>
>> I had thought about it. I had not tried it, and, to my deception,
>> exactly the same facts happen. When I use hptalx for the first time as
>> root, I configure the calculator, I `Save' but when I click `Connect'
>> bug buddy pops. :-(
>
> Wow...
As you say. Special!
>
> How about...?
>
> 1/ Pressing "O.K", instead "save", it will keep your settings only for the
> current session but it just to test if it works :-?
Impossible without modifying .hptalx, as the application directly bugs when I type
`hptalx'. This is instantaneous.
I just renamed .hptalx in .hptalx2, and the program starts normally,
without bugging.
Pressing `O.K.' does not make the app bugging, but once I click on
`Connect', bug buddy directly arises! (And, without the connection
capability, the program is totally unuseful, as it is its goal.)
> 2/ Look at "~/.hptalx" file and check if the previously saved settings
> seem right (port connection pointing to /dev/ttyUSB0, and so on...).
==
~$ cat .hptalx
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<hptalx>
<port>100</port>
<speed>9600</speed>
<deleteconfirm>1</deleteconfirm>
<startconnected>1</startconnected>
<waitconnect>15</waitconnect>
<editor>gedit</editor>
</hptalx>
==
Strange, really. I compiled it the other day, and the whole process
went through without any issue.
- --
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --
What doesn't kill you will make you stronger. (Friedrich Nietzsche)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkvkhiUACgkQM0LLzLt8MhwOTQCePMN9v5VHO7yr96tibEMtxNNR
NWoAn1Nsnlo4AvBo2sdb/nZZbVQ7er3R
=6Vpi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: