[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Dell E6410, squeeze, touchpad anddddd keyboard problems



On 12/23/2010 08:44 AM, Johann Spies wrote:
Apologies for the long post but it is along and sad story :)

I have been made sad by a Dell laptop or two. ;-)

...

Maybe all the problems are related to my inabillity to disable the touchpad.
On this
syeX11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
(I pushed Cntl-C otherwise it would have been a few lines of these)

sorry, that was meant to be 'system X11 functions without
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.'

As you can see in the above line sometimes the keyboard misses a pressed
key ('sye' - must have been 'system') and sometimes it repeats keys. Other
times, like when I work in Emacs with more than one buffer in split windows,
the cursor jumps to another frame and the typing continues in another
buffer.

On my previous laptop (Thinkpad R61e) I could use the following to disable
the touchpad:

/usr/bin/synclient "TouchpadOff=\
`/usr/bin/synclient -l | sed -ne \
's/\(TouchpadOff *= *\)\([01]\)/\2/p' | sed -e 'y/01/10/'`"

Now when I try this I get 'Couldn't find synaptics properties. No synaptics
driver loaded?'

I had the same sort of issue with a Dell Precision M70 laptop. The answer was to change the touchpad setting in the BIOS setup program. The wording on this one (which is actually a Lat. D810 or somesuch motherboard / BIOS) I had to look at the boot behavior of the touchpad. The choices weren't exactly what I would have expected. They were along the lines of:

1. touchpad enabled
2. touchpad disabled when PS/2 mouse is connected
3. serial mouse

The one that succeeded in disabling the touchpad was the serial mouse setting.

If you have a similar option for turning off the touchpad in your BIOS I strongly suggest that you use it. That way, you won't have to use an xorg.conf file and the OS doesn't have to deal with the little bugger at all.

...


Regards.

Johann

I hope that helps.

Gilbert


Reply to: