[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rkhunter report



On 11/20/2010 03:59 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> File a bug against rkhunter, then.
that is a thought..
>> >I just don't like getting messages that tell me something is NOT
>> >uptodate, when I am ALWAYS up to date..
> Many people don't consider Debian stable up-to-date even with packages from 
> security.debian.org and volatile.debian.org in use.  It is possible that the 
> development / release team of rkhunter contains some of those people.
> -- 
I have volatile commented out in my sources.list.. should I be using it?
 sources.list:

deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian lenny main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main contrib non-free
deb http://security.us.debian.org/ lenny/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://tovid.sourceforge.net/download/debian lenny contrib
deb-src http://tovid.sourceforge.net/download/debian lenny contrib
deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ lenny non-free
deb http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable non-free

######### End of suggested Stable repos ###########
### EXTERNAL SOURCES ###
 
# for avasys for Epson printing
deb http://www.da-cha.jp/debian/dists/etch ./
 
#backports go here:
deb http://www.backports.org/debian lenny-backports main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free
deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org lenny main
# added linuxfoundation-openprinting for HPLIP
deb http://www.openprinting.org/download/printdriver/debian/ lsb3.2 main
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny-proposed-updates contrib
non-free main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny-proposed-updates contrib
non-free main
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates contrib non-free main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates contrib non-free main
 
##spotify
deb http://repository.spotify.com stable non-free
 

-- 
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800 



Reply to: