Re: new cpu amd 810 Quad core (with 900 pins) some pins are bent any idea how to fix?
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:35:10 -0700, Bob wrote in message
<[🔎] 20101112213510.GD12217@hysteria.proulx.com>:
> Mitchell Laks wrote:
> > ... they bent some of the pins...
> > there are about 900 !!!
>
> 938 pins
..grab your and empty your 0.3 or 0.5mm mechanical pencil, slip
its lead tube over each pin and bend them home, one by one. ;o)
..multiple pins can be "plowed" ;o) or bent home
simultaneously with a knife, usually takes several
passes along "the lanes."
> > Now it wont install into the socket AM3.
..you _are_ sure both the cpu and socket are AM3?
> > however it still resists putting into the socket on the asus
> > motherboard. any other ideas on how to ease it in?
>
> There really isn't any substitute for carefully straightening the
> pins. It is tedious but can be successfully accomplished. Just work
> carefully and patiently. If you find yourself frustrated then pause,
> take a break, and then come back to it. This is a task that requires
> careful patience rather like straightening a bicycle wheel. In
> addition to the techniques you described you may need to squeeze a pin
> to straighten it if it is curved. A pair of flat tweezers has worked
> for me for that purpose.
>
> Be careful of electro static discharge and do not "zap" it while
> trying to fix it! Also be careful of bending any individual pin too
> much. It work hardens the metal and in a bad case might break off.
>
> Side Note: Professional shops often have a metal block with the holes
> drilled representing the socket holes. The holes are beveled to guide
> the pins into the right locations. This type of custom made jig is
> often used to straighten pins. We had several at my previous
> employer.
..cheaper ones can be "angle ground" off burnt etc main boards. ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: