[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Partitioning a drive with Windows 7 already installed



On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 02:43:06 -0700, consul tores <consultores1@gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2010/10/23 consul tores <consultores1@gmail.com>:
>> 2010/10/23 David Van Mosselbeen <david.van.mosselbeen@telenet.be>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Kinda late to reply on this, but yah...
>>>
>>> My wife own a Compaq laptop with Windows 7 preinstalled. A few days
ago
>>> i
>>> have installed Debian testing (the daily netinst cd) on it. I have
>>> resized
>>> the windows NTFS partition with the debian installer. Just select that
>>> option to manualy manage the partition when you are on the partitions
>>> screen. Then i created the needed linux partitions. Then installed the
>>> base
>>> install and installed all my lovely toys.
>>>
>>> All was ok, just got a little bonus issue, nothing to do with the
>>> partitioning (i think). Grub not showing the windows 7 entry in the
>>> bootloader menu. os-prober was been detecting 3 Windows operating
>>> systems
>>> (1 win7 and 2 of Vista which i don't have). Had need to run
update-grub
>>> to
>>> get this issue fixed. Well, i still have an issue with showing 3
windows
>>> operating systems in the bootloader, but that's another issue :) Maybe
>>> the
>>> black magic of the Compaq recovery utility for Windows. I still need
to
>>> check.
>>>
>>> Anyway, i recommend you make a good backup before doing irreversible
>>> things.
>>>
>>> Bah, i guess your install is already done a few days ago :) But so you
>>> know about this one which i find kinda nice and easy to do.
>>>
>>> Have a nice day all,
>>> David,
>>
>> Hello David
>>
>> Just by curiosity! Have you tested your HD using cfdisk, fdisk or
sfdisk?
>> could you please show the output?
> 
> Ooops, i send it privately; David, could you please show the output of
> fdisk and sfdisk?
> 
> -- 
>            Consultores Agropecuarios.
> Administracion, Produccion, Capacitacion.

Hi Tores,

It's good that you talk about it. Seems that there's a little issue with
the partitions.

cfdisk complains with: FATAL ERROR: Bad primary partition 2: Partition
ends in the final partial cylinder Press any key to exit cfdisk

And here's output of fdisk:

# fdisk -l /dev/sda

Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x1d0caa27

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1               1          26      203776    7  HPFS/NTFS
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sda2              26       48657   390625000    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda3           59018       60802    14329856    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda4           48657       59018    83225601    5  Extended
/dev/sda5           48657       49629     7812096   82  Linux swap /
Solaris
/dev/sda6   *       49629       59018    75412480   83  Linux

Partition table entries are not in disk order

And even sfdisk complains:

# sfdisk -l /dev/sda

Disk /dev/sda: 60801 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track
Warning: extended partition does not start at a cylinder boundary.
DOS and Linux will interpret the contents differently.
Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0

   Device Boot Start     End   #cyls    #blocks   Id  System
/dev/sda1          0+     25-     26-    203776    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda2         25+  48656-  48631- 390625000    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda3      59017+  60801-   1784-  14329856    7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/sda4      48656+  59017-  10362-  83225601    5  Extended
/dev/sda5      48656+  49628-    973-   7812096   82  Linux swap / Solaris
/dev/sda6   *  49628+  59017-   9389-  75412480   83  Linux

I wonder if this issue happen due the installer or the black magic that is
behind that Compaq recovery tool and partition. Or even if that's why
os-prober react so and the need to run update-grub manually. I should
stratch my head. I don't know concequences this could have, nor how to fix
it yet. Need to check.

I can't reproduce it in vmware-server right now. There's and issue to
install it on Squeeze, i need to investigate that also.

Kind regards,
David


Reply to: