[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: acroread and iceweasel

Is it okay to install the firefox side by side with iceweasles? I mean, at the same time.



From: #ZHAO LINA# [ZHAO0139@e.ntu.edu.sg]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:24 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: acroread and iceweasel

It's pretty annoying especially when sometimes you need a bunch of papers.

I cannot uninstall it, can somesome provide some solutions?

Or anyone who works fine to open the pdf within iceweasel time and time again would love to share how they handle it. I did not encounter that problem before when I used firefox.



From: John A. Sullivan III [jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:17 PM
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: acroread and iceweasel

On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:44 +0000, #ZHAO LINA# wrote:
>  Hi,
> When I tried to use acroread my.pdf
> it showed me,
> Gtk-Message: Failed to load module
> "canberra-gtk-module": /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
> It's not the main point cause it's no problem view the pdf, the main
> issue was that,
> When I opened pdf in the iceweasel, it showed me nothing even I waited
> pretty long. A compromise way to solve it was to restart the iceweasel
> and it only worked once, when the second pdf opened, it still was
> blank, so no choice but to restart it again. Any advise about this?
> Thanks ahead for any suggestions.
> lina
I have experienced the same thing with the pdf plugin.  It works the
first time and fails every subsequent time until restarting the browser.
That's why we uninstalled it - John

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 926556EF12693342860CC687DC13545C9A21D1@SINPRD0103MB044.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 926556EF12693342860CC687DC13545C9A21D1@SINPRD0103MB044.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com

Reply to: