Re: Comments on proposed partitioning scheme
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:29:28 +0200
Aniruddha <mailingdotlist@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's my opinion:
...
> * I think encryption is not well suited for a desktop system, unless
> you have some special need for it (e.g. laptop). It creates extra
> overhead, meaning it is a lot slower then a normal file system + it
> makes disaster recovery more difficult.
I'm not sure that an encrypted filesystem is really "a lot slower than
a normal file system" on modern HW. Do you have benchmarks or
references?
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, an offline RSS/Atom aggregator
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator
Reply to: