[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Corrupted FS every 50 checks



Hanspeter Spalinger wrote:
> On 08/14/2010 09:01 PM, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I have the fs' checking period set to 50 mounts for now some years. The
> > problem is that I always get errors when e2fsck verifies the fs, and
> > always on the same: /dev/sdc5. Well, this is where I have all my docs,
> > my university stuff, and this is even more annoying. I could do backups,
> > but I can't understand why this filesystem is problematic, because I
> > don't use it often, at least these times. I always have errors about the
> > AucTeX files. Well, auctex is simply an emacs extension for LaTeX, and I
> > can't understand why some specific files always cause troubles. I don't
> > always get the same errors. This time, it was mainly *things like error
> > filesystem Inode has EXTENTS_FL flag set, but not too many.*
> > **
> > *1) Why are they happening? My disk is not old. (/dev/sdc5 is on another
> > disk than the /etc, etc.)*
> > *2) Should I think about buying another hdd? I tried with the hdd life
> > tools (I can't remember their names) which are bundled with Debian, but
> > they don't show any failing thing (they have quite the same score as
> > other hdds in my computer).*
> > ***
>
> > Thanks.
> > *
>
> Hi,
> Do you actualy FIX those errors? Afaik the fsck at startup does not fix
> all errors (it plays safe). Try run fsck manualy (but make a backup
> first and read the man-page).
Yes, I always fix them. If necessary, I fix them manually.
> I assume you use the other partitions more often, with no error, so i
> don't think your problem is hardware related.
Huh? I can't understand that. Would you mean that when a partition is
not used often, it is more error-prone (subject to errors)?

Thanks.

-- 
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an incompatibility problem with your mail
client, please contact me.




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: