[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Local apt repository and specific version



Sort of - but it can actually do the install:

The following packages are BROKEN:
  package-system
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  package-system: Depends: package1 (= 2.1.88) but it is not installable
                Depends: package2 (= 2.1.88) but it is not installable
                Depends: package3 (= 2.1.88) but it is not installable
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Install the following packages:
package1 [2.1.88 (unstable)]
packge2 [2.1.88 (unstable)]
packge3 [2.1.88 (unstable)]

Selecting yes goes ahead and installs package1 2 and 3 followed by
package-system

How can a package that is "not installable" then be installed??!

Thanks


On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jo, 01 iul 10, 20:51:05, Didster wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Then "apt-get install package-system" installs package-system 2.0.2
>> along with V2.1.99 of the three packages.  But "apt-get install
>> package-system=2.0.1" fails as follows:
>>
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
>>   package-system: Depends: package1 (= 2.1.88) but 2.1.99 is to be installed
>>                 Depends: package2 (= 2.1.88) but 2.1.99 is to be installed
>>                 Depends: package3 (= 2.1.88) but 2.1.99 is to be installed
>> E: Broken packages
>
> Does aptitude behave the same way?
>
> Regards,
> Andrei
> --
> Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMLP31AAoJEHNWs3jeoi3pjyMH/2hgebZN/XviZNwxJowTqr5A
> xIJObvCcJ8Ndr1vvQpPzXaQHzSHMvJSpPBojL1lcspJBnzVN6kcryAdeTXlguo6+
> 4ZFjtRDfd0J0LOLMHulNtB4oKIuSX1KT7+wiIkclcJRdHt02Os2qSkPzhMmiwTl8
> L6qsjVGbtkKbczFVl2SMr065aZtzs5ehpg6pqRLGESf8z8bBsjTgNw9+RLSx7u1m
> HXPFYRExKt09lmt9jfeO4MYHzAtBGdMtUsCQtRHV8MgZy//wgX68iz8Tlew0IyWz
> 0ToJJSWTx3pEsd0F+e/4zmv6RRkSVrhoFoHxOURyEA6PRH+oJaGk5HPKs19InGQ=
> =RB/Y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


Reply to: