[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How 'stable' is squeeze?



I had similar problem when upgrading from lenny to testing.
First pull newer kernel image, 2.6.30,  if I recall correctly
(but don't pull 2.6.32-x yet, cause depends on new udev).
Reboot. Then pull new udev, and reboot again. Now you can
pull newest kernel.

Hopefully if want to upgrade from testing to sid, then you won't
have o much trouble, at least I didn't had.

For me sid is stable enough, and I'm not having mercy to my
laptop, running BOINC projects 24/7, with CPU temp around 90°,
but it is just me...  :)
in fact it is behaving more stable than lenny ever had, even testing
wasn't too stable in my case.

2010/6/25 Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>:
> On 6/24/2010 5:49 PM, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Mark:
>>>
>>> I would retain the Lenny security update line in sources.list (for luck)
>>> until Squeeze is released as Stable, and start with safe-upgrade.
>>
>> That's of little to no value since "security" will do nothing for packages
>> you
>> already have a higher version installed due to you going for Squeeze (it
>> shouldn't hurt, either, so go as you please).
>
>
>
> The point is, there are a few things that aren't higher versions.  A thing
> or two.
>
> (That will surely change in the run up to release.)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject
> of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 4C2482F9.1050308@allums.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 4C2482F9.1050308@allums.com
>
>



-- 
darkestkhan
------------------------------------------
jid: darkestkhan@gmail.com


Reply to: