Re: How 'stable' is squeeze?

[Amar Cosic <amar.cosic@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> wrote:

On 24/06/10 10:03, Sven Joachim wrote:

On 2010-06-24 08:29 +0200, Alan Chandler wrote:

Yesterday, a fix for a problem where you could not make ext2, ext3 or
ext4 filesystems made it into testing.  This has been around for a few
weeks, and although there is a workaround using the updated version
from SID, all the installation CDs from the weekly builds have not yet
caught up.

This can be worked around by using a daily snapshot of the installer:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/

Worked fine for me in qemu three days ago.

Unfortunately for me, these images did not recognise all my hardware, whereas the weekly build full CD image did.  They are using the sid installer which is why they have a more up to date version.

--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk


--

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Archive: [🔎] 4C2446A7.5040107@chandlerfamily.org.uk" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 4C2446A7.5040107@chandlerfamily.org.uk

Well it ended up broken last night.. Everything boots OK but gdm wont
start properly and doing aptitude safe-upgrade/full-upgrade acctualy
shows some errors about udev. Funny thing is I did aptitude
install linux-image-2.6-686 before everything, but this acctualy pull'd
a lot of things.. including udev. Weird that new udev depends on new
kernel,but in same time it depends on it ?
So without having any time for fixing, and without any graphical inv.
would downloading and installing daily netinst cd of squeeze work OK ?

http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/


tnx.


-- 
Amar Ćosić
amar.cosic@gmail.com
amar@amar.ba
+38761240095
http://www.amar.ba