Re: Mutt and GPG - claims ALL signatures can't be verified

To: debian-user <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Mutt and GPG - claims ALL signatures can't be verified
From: Alexander Batischev <eual.jp@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:03:22 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100611180322.GB28318@speedy>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100611174809.GA28318@speedy>
References: <[🔎] 20100611174809.GA28318@speedy>

Some thoughts which just came to my head: can it be because of lack of trusted
keys? I did not set anyone's key as trusted, so I don't have web of trust. This
still don't explain (in my opinion, at least) why my own signature can't be
verified.

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Batischev

1024D/69093C81
F870 A381 B5F5 D2A1 1B35  4D63 A1A7 1C77 6909 3C81

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mutt and GPG - claims ALL signatures can't be verified
  - From: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>

References:
- Mutt and GPG - claims ALL signatures can't be verified
  - From: Alexander Batischev <eual.jp@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ftp.us.debian.org really slow/nonresponsive
Next by Date: Re: ls -alR with wd?
Previous by thread: Mutt and GPG - claims ALL signatures can't be verified
Next by thread: Re: Mutt and GPG - claims ALL signatures can't be verified
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread