Re: executable won't execute
On 2010-05-17 08:46 +0200, Alexey Salmin wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Sven Joachim <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 2010-05-15 11:04 +0200, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
>>>> [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-lsb.so.3]
>>> That dynamic linker doesn't look right. A little googling shows that
>>> Redhat and Suse seem to be using that one now. A missing linker is,
>>> by the way, the only other reason for execve() to return ENOENT ("file
>>> not found") I know of - missing dependencies produce a different error.
>>> Anyway, Debian still has /lib/ld-linux.so.2 - you could try symlinking
>>> them, but I doubt it will work.
>> Why not? Do you think that Redhat and Suse do something else? Anyway,
>> this symlink should be in the lsb-core package; it was added in 3.0.6
>> (see #326609š) but seems to have gone AWOL since then.
> So, it's a bug in lsb-core package?
Yes, the LSB mandates that /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 is the dynamic linker: