[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rsync: different target size




On Jan 19, 2010, at 5:58 AM, Leonardo Canducci wrote:

( cd source ; find . -type f -print0 | sort -z | xargs ls -s ) >
/tmp/source-stuff
( cd target ; find . -type f -print0 | sort -z | xargs ls -s ) >
/tmp/target-stuff
diff /tmp/target-stuff /tmp/source-stuff

you can use something like "md5sum" in place of "ls -s" if you want a more
industrial strength check...

how does that compare to rsync -cn? Is it faster? safer?

It's probably about the same speed as "rsync -cn", but it doesn't depend on rsync. I was thinking: if you don't trust rsync, then use something else to generate the checksums. But if you trust rsync, why bother with double-checking in the first place?

Rick


Reply to: