In <4B44B28B.email@example.com>, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > To make OpenGL > really scream on single user 3D chips, they had to eliminate over the > network OpenGL completely, as keeping that capability would have totally > hosed the rendering pipeline performance for 3D chips. That makes no sense. OpenGL is an abstration, like the X protocol itself. We don't have to throw away network-transparent X to get high performance local X. We also don't have to throw away network-transparent OpenGL to get high performance local OpenGL. I've fairly certain the GLX extension is still available over the network, although certain features may be missing (and advertised as such). That said, even if OpenGL is accelerated on the X server side, it won't feel accelerated over the network because of the additional delay introduced by the network. Geometric drawing commands will have a delay equal to at least half your ping time. Textures or very complex objects will have additional delay based on the size of the data and your available bandwidth. Multi-stage rendering will have much greater delays, and no-so-modern games use multi- stage rendering for shadowing, among other things. TLDR: GL should work over the network, it will just not feel accelerated. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. firstname.lastname@example.org ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.