[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lenny -> Squeeze Not Upgrading



I use OpenDNS so my /etc/resolv.conf looks like:

domain blackgold.org
search blackgold.org
nameserver 208.67.220.220
nameserver 208.67.222.222

I'm not sure what the 'domain' and 'search' parts are, but anyway, I can ping both debian.crosslink.net and ftp.us.debian.org and suffer no surfing troubles.

I changed sources.list back to use 'lenny' again and I'm getting errors with that now too. I've not messed with my system. The last time was using aptitude to "Update" security updates.  If I recall all of them where libraries.

What would be the next thing I could check?
Thank in advance

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Sascha Silbe <sascha-ml-debian-user@silbe.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 11:38:36AM -0800, chris kerr wrote:

Err http://debian.crosslink.net squeeze Release.gpg  Cannot initiate  the connection to 8118:80 (0.0.31.182). - connect (22 Invalid argument)
Sounds like your DNS resolver / resolving server is broken (0.0.31.182 is a reserved IP address, i.e. invalid). Check /etc/resolv.conf and the output of "ping -n debian.crosslink.net".

BTW: debian.crosslink.net is a CNAME referencing another CNAME (debian.crosslink.net. -> thay.crosslink.net. -> ftp.us.debian.org.) which is discouraged by RFC1034 (section 3.6.2). If you're using some embedded device ("broadband router") as resolving server it might be choking on this construction.

CU Sascha

--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLQ6DXAAoJELpz82VMF3Da+KcH/2kdiScd5X1b3XH+zFNQH/48
Edq1UPXlKjS+S5HMpHVCH8RnWgpkNqB/w4ZKuQzLstMFGrNQigk558DB6E5eArt9
9C8KnBNl22M/S/xttK/BDBjTtHiKSjdgg/+V5Ts4ahep1dMsXp87DecWOpCYF2w5
0FIYZf5sbRbyd+qM4kZYqVc0xHgcZTWL2oyajMOVw0NwvSc90iLRh9lcJNDIbB4q
YbDIeWzA17pk4NPLFM7KT/StGZTOHP6bkTysPs83lEb4TdM4RQ2a0ylUMOTJeuiB
uhdwNpTHK7haPDYD0pYlN6lYHIYlPvfCgyxATCfwp1hBiWJbqVMUW041V3X6icA=
=mssa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: