Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
From: Tom H <tomh0665@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:06:04 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 6d4219cc0912281806t72df808v99855f3d2438c141@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20091228114800.GA31422@turki.gavron.org>
References: <[🔎] 20091225221913.GJ5805@n0nb.us> <[🔎] 20091228104052.GF3575@think.homelan> <[🔎] 20091228114800.GA31422@turki.gavron.org>

> I'm not sure that's what the OP was asking for, though, because I'm
> unclear as to how he could have a kernel that treats all drives as sda..

> Sounds pretty risky to me.

This is standard behaviour for Fedora and Ubuntu. The kernel uses
libata for both SATA and PATA.

Reply to:

References:
- Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
  - From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
- Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
  - From: Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
  - From: Chris Jones <cjns1989@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
Next by Date: Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
Previous by thread: Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
Next by thread: Re: Having Grub2 use UUID instead of (hd0,1)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread