[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Building a 2.6.30 kernel that does NOT require initrd



On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:46:47PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> 

[snip]

> >>>
> >>
> >>Alex,
> >>
> >>How does having an initrd prove more or less beneficial than not
> >>having one?
> >>
> >>IMO I like simplicity and a straight forward boot configuration:
> >>
> >>1. /boot/kernel
> >>2. /boot/System.map
> >>3. lilo
> >>4. modules (if necessary)
> >>
> >>No other components.
> >
> >My root is on a encrypted lvm partition can you load that with out a
> >initrd ?
> Good point :)  Initrd is useful for some applications, I just was
> not utilizing any of them, thanks.

I was just seeing if I was missing something, it just seems like a pain
to have to recompile, although with all the tools thats easy.  Maybe it
just me getting older, but I tend to stick to the path of least
resistance.

> 
> >
> >>
> >>Justin.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: