[I'm putting this back on list]
On Mon,13.Jul.09, 13:46:15, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Is this also the case where hdparm -z force the kernel to reload the
> partition table ? In my case the device nodes did not changen. Fdisk -l
> confirm that all partitions are where they are expected.
>
> What a sence makes the /proc/partitions entry makes if it's not compleate
> for fixed drives ? For a dynamicaly attached USB drive the partitions are
> there. Will UUID really solve this issue ? I do not thing so, but where to
> start searching ?
Ok, scrap that idea.
> What about udev who is responsible for the device nodes within the initrd
> environment ? Who is really responsible to load the partitipn tables ? For
> me it seams to be the kernel driver. Dmsg confirm that asumption. Why do I
> get an "Devise or reasource is busy" ?
Could you check if your initrd contains the correct module for your SATA
chipset? If not adding it might solve your issue.
> Regards,
> Raphael
[snip full quote of my mail]
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJKWyypAAoJEHNWs3jeoi3p39UH/iAc3sjpoILCTOPa+usb+F+D
an90xNgxp0mpmIJTvFzRjQkmPJoVbP9z5Ct9fvG8Uy8aJB/qIJLRm7bu2fPFJeyZ
y1A86FeRQwZzPdCAVFgs/M5QX7Fu1k5VQHm9DeoSCdRvKQsEOUHkniWBvIMT8CDG
uTheQNahNUtEDFfRA5DlWSYYP6HEBuJi/X6eiRdKtHgoCGZ2ZQ5vnIyVJaLeQaYR
IrHGznK0ugfhbEHW5vGqBgPR6opw52Fo1TIbas9+gJGTkesdO0Y15gTnKbY0ohmK
hMQWdjHJEGHvUjrWjN2zqXadXllSlz9Cd9d9Upn2fyC32egWS6ig9+WbNqm6CCs=
=nDfX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----