In <[🔎] dbfe76710906101513s41b879aeyaa40a8124c2da123@mail.gmail.com>, Tony Asnicar wrote: >Could that be a security "hole" that the normal iptables is managing IPv4? I don't see how. >I mean if theres normally IPv6 support on the machine, it could have a > good firewall over IPv4, but it will not be firewalled under IPv6?? That's what ip6tables is for. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.