Re: KDE is now broken (Fwd: Heads-up: KDE4 hitting testing tonight (UTC) )
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:31:00AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <[🔎] 20090526142918.GC5158@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote:
> >On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 01:17:16PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >> In <[🔎] 20090525163904.GB5158@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote:
> >> >On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 03:28:50PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >> >> In <[🔎] 20090524145214.GA16426@cat.rubenette.is-a-geek.com>, lee wrote:
> >> >> >I
> >> >> >don't want to run an akonadi server either, whatever that is.
> >> >> Oh, then you don't want to run those parts of KDE; They require a
> >> >> connection to an Akonadi server. They've been scheduled to since
> >> >> before KDE 4.0 was available.
> >> >Maybe not. I'd be fine without them, if it would work without --- but
> >> >it doesn't.
> >> I said it before, and I'll say it again: That is just not true. I was
> >> careful in my package selection and I have a working KDE 4.2 (including
> >> my must-have kmail) and I do not have a mysql server installed.
> >>
> >> KDE 4.2 can work without Akonadi, with a minimum of fuss.
> >It is true, just a matter of fact.
>
> No, it is not.
>
> Your statement: KDE 4.2 doesn't work without the parts that want an Akonadi
> server.
I've never said that.
Reply to: