Re: Possibly non-fatal smart errors

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Possibly non-fatal smart errors
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:03:42 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 2d460de70904141703w248d58cfo703890bb688f9881@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2d460de70904141510g4969eea9m563b25b84319b17a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 2d460de70904141510g4969eea9m563b25b84319b17a@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 22:10, Richard Hartmann
<richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:


> PS: If the extended test comes up with anything bad, I
> will throw it away, anyway.

fwiw:
# 1  Extended offline    Completed without error       00%       441         -


Richard

Reply to:

References:
- Possibly non-fatal smart errors
  - From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: massive copy
Next by Date: HOWTO Make XEmacs switch to buffer
Previous by thread: Possibly non-fatal smart errors
Next by thread: HOWTO Make XEmacs switch to buffer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread